Phone
+91 22 4002 0954 | +91 89768 92575
Contact Email
info@lawquestinternational.com
Schedule Consultation

Lack of Interest in Partner’s Religious Life Is Not a Ground for Denying ‘Partner Visa’: Federal Court of Australia

Recently, the Federal Court of Australia adjudicated upon a very important question in light of the worldwide increase in the number of immigrants, and the growing number of cross-cultural marriages: is a Partner Visa applicant’s lack of interest in the religious affairs of the sponsoring partner a ground for denial of Partner Visa?

The question came for consideration before the Court in the case of Singh v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, (2017) FCA: 1298. The case was filed by a Sikh citizen of India who had arrived in Australia on a student visa in 2009. In 2013, he married an Australian citizen who was Christian, and thereafter applied for a Partner Visa. However, the Department of Immigration and Border Protection refused his application.

Thereafter, he filed an appeal before the Migration Review Tribunal, during which he said that he had not inquired about his wife’s religious interests or the church to which she belonged. The Tribunal affirmed the refusal of the Partner Visa on the ground that the lack of the applicant’s interest in the religious affairs of the sponsor indicated his lack of emotional support to her. In Australia, Regulation 1.15A(3)(d)(iii) of the Migration Regulations, 1994 provides that one of the factors to be considered in granting a Partner Visa is the degree of companionship and emotional support that the persons in the relationship derive from each other.

Reversing the decision of the Tribunal, the Federal Court held that lack of interest in one’s partner’s religious life does not indicate the lack of emotional support to the partner; and thus, cannot be considered as the sole ground for refusing the application for Partner Visa. The Court observed that the Tribunal should carry out the task of assessing the degree of emotional support that the parties derive from each other on a case-by-case basis rather than establishing religious interests as a basis of emotional support, as though religious considerations may be important in some relationships, it is not necessary that it may be important in all relationships.


Isha Kalwant Singh, Legal Intern

(Keywords: Partner Visa, Religion, Immigrant, Emotional Support)

Related Posts

DISCLAIMER: The rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit advertisement or solicitation by Advocates in any form or manner.

This website www.lawquestinternational.com and the contents thereof are merely for informational purposes and not in the nature of solicitation or an advertisement. Similarly, any content posted by LawQuest on this website shall not be construed as legal advice. LawQuest takes no liability for consequences of any action taken by you relying on the content posted on this website.

By visiting this website, you confirm and acknowledge that you have voluntarily sought the information relating to and/or posted by LawQuest and there has been no solicitation/advertisement/inducement by either LawQuest and/or its members.

We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings

  • DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER

The rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit advertisement or solicitation by Advocates in any form or manner.

This website www.lawquestinternational.com and the contents thereof are merely for informational purposes and not in the nature of solicitation or an advertisement. Similarly, any content posted by LawQuest on this website shall not be construed as legal advice. LawQuest takes no liability for consequences of any action taken by you relying on the content posted on this website.

By visiting this website, you confirm and acknowledge that you have voluntarily sought the information relating to and/or posted by LawQuest and there has been no solicitation/advertisement/inducement by either LawQuest and/or its members.